![]() Invisible in the Finder sense and the the leading dot sense. Most of the time I don't want to search inside bundles. Not have the search unilaterally always search bundle contents. I was looking for an option to optionally show bundle contents. Hey, you could use all those new processor cores simultaneously □ Why not just show all the mounted volumes and a associated checkbox to allow me to check off which ones I wan? On larger monitors yours requires a lot of mouse moving back and forth. You'll see that you can choose any set of volumes and folders to search, see the included Help->Documentation for that. I make more money with direct sales from my website anyway (Fastspring takes only 10%, not 30% like Apple) □ Oh, and no worries - The App Store is only an option. Yeah, not likely to happen anytime soon, sorry. You can do that in FAF, or what do you miss?Ĥ. I have it already on my list for the next big release (after this one).ģ. Yet, I agree, that if that's what you really want, FAF should provide it. I'd have to perform a search for all file names containing a ".", and then filter out those that start with it. But nowadays lots of files are hidden by starting with a "." in their name. Granted, but a bit difficult: The fast OS search function I use doesn't have a criterium for "hidden", not in the modern Unix sense - it can only find items that use the old style hide flag. There's just no option to show _only_ bundle contents. FAF does certainly include bundle contents. I'm contemplating the idea to run simultaneous searches on different drives, but for most people who have just one disk this isn't helping.)ġ. (Although, I must admit, they're still only searched one after the other. So far, I've tried EasyFind (very useful, but not for 1 and 6) NotLight, a slightly improved Spotlight interface (neither 1 nor 6) Find Any File (not 1, 2, 6, 7) HoudahSpot (1 partial, not 2, not 7) Alfred (not 1, 2, 5, 6, 7). (I know that it's possible to use mdfind or saved queries in Spotlight to achieve something like this, but neither option is even close to what I would call "convenient".) I'm looking from something that, ideally, works exactly like pre-Tiger Finder's "Find" command, that is,Ħ - has the ability to search simultaneously more than one folders selected in Finderħ - displays path (or at least parent folder) in the search results and can sort by this criterion They must find Spotlight a godsend but I'm not one of them.) (I know Mac users who save absolutely everything on their desktop who can't remember if some info they urgently need is in an e-mail, on a web page, or in a file and who have no interest whatever in finding a. The most serious 10.6.8 annoyance so far is Spotlight, which I find quite useless. I've recently updated from Panther to Snow Leopard (which, I must confess, I don't like) given the experience so far, and what I've read about Lion, I've no intention to update to the latter. Hello, I'm a newbie to this forum, though not to the Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |